 The Triumph of the Rentier? Thomas Piketty vs. Luigi Pasinetti and John Maynard KeynesInternational Journal of Political Economy, 2014, vol. 43, issue 3, 4-17 Abstract: Thomas Piketty attributes increasing wealth inequality to the characteristics of a neoclassical aggregate production function, which is known not to exist. More plausibly, wage repression can lead to secular stagnation by enriching the rentier. Lower economic activity decreases labor’s bargaining power so that the share of profits in output (π)tends to rise. Activity is stimulated by increased investment due to a higher π. Dynamics of wealth are specified in terms of the ratio Z of capital owned by a capitalist rentier class to the total, a variation on a well-known theme by Luigi Pasinetti. Suppose that Z goes up. Rentiers have a high saving rate—from the paradox of thrift, output goes down. The profit share increases, pushing up the growth rate of Z. Depending on economic structure (in particular, differences in saving rates between the classes), this positive feedback may or may not destabilize the system. If stability reigns, there will be a persistent steady-state level of Z. In the long run, Z is reduced and activity increased by a downward shift in π, that is, less wage repression improves economic performance overall. Date: 2014 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:ijpoec:v:43:y:2014:i:3:p:4-17 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/08911916.2014.1002296 Access Statistics for this article More articles in International Journal of Political Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.