Empirical Study on Subsidiary Reacquisition Among Japanese Companies

Minoru Otsubo and Yusuke Miyoshi

Japanese Economy, 2009, vol. 36, issue 4, 31-60

Abstract: This study presents an empirical analysis of the reasons Japanese companies are pursuing subsidiary reacquisition, with a particular focus on listed subsidiaries. Based on previous research on listed subsidiaries, we identified and empirically analyzed five hypotheses regarding the motivation for pursuing reacquisition: the information asymmetry hypothesis, restructuring hypothesis, low growth hypothesis, conflict-of-interest hypothesis, and hostile merger and acquisition (M&A) hypothesis. The results did not offer support for the information asymmetry hypothesis, low growth hypothesis, or hostile M&A hypothesis, but did in part support the restructuring hypothesis and low growth hypothesis. They also showed that the restructuring hypothesis is the only one of these five that accounts for the possibility of an increase in the share value of the parent company.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2753/JES1097-203X360402 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:jpneco:v:36:y:2009:i:4:p:31-60

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/MJES19

DOI: 10.2753/JES1097-203X360402

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Japanese Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().