Boron Dynamics in Agricultural Soils of the Cerrado: Study on Sources, Doses and Leaching
Jefferson Ferreira da Silva,
Stephany Diolino Cunha,
Henyo Alves Rodrigues Dias,
Matheus da Silva Araújo,
Ednaldo Cândido Rocha,
Márcio da Silva Araújo and
Adilson Pelá
Journal of Agricultural Studies, 2021, vol. 9, issue 2, 488-504
Abstract:
The objectives of this study were- to evaluate the leaching potential of B in a Latossolo Vermelho-Amarelo (Oxisol) as a function of sources and doses of this micronutrient; among the sources tested (boric acid, ulexite and the commercial source H2 Boro), to determine the one with the lowest leaching potential; to evaluate leaching losses at different doses in each soil layer evaluated; and to identify chemical and physical variables of soils that influence B leaching. For that, two experiments were conducted in a greenhouse. The first one tested B leaching in the soil, with the three sources under study and five doses of B (0; 12; 24; 36; and 48 kg ha-1), whereas the second experiment evaluated the influence of soil physical and chemical attributes on B leaching using soils randomly collected in 22 localities in southeastern Goiás, Brazil. Regardless of the dose applied, ulexite led to the lowest soluble B content in the profile of the analyzed soils and also in the leachate. Boric acid was the only source that showed a different behavior in relation to B content in the different soil layers and in the leachate. In the soil layer from 21 to 30 cm, ulexite is the source with the lowest soluble B content. The behaviors of the more soluble sources, in this case boric acid and H2 Boro (H2 Agrosciences - Monoethanolamine borate), regardless of the dose, are very similar, being highly leachable in the profile of the Oxisol used. Soils with clayey texture and higher values of H+Al and CEC were able to retain higher B contents in the upper portion their profiles (layers from 0 to 10 cm and 11 to 20 cm), but soils with sandy texture and higher values of sum of bases showed greater B losses by leaching.
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/18581/14475 (application/pdf)
http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/18581 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mth:jas888:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:488-504
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Agricultural Studies is currently edited by Richard Williams
More articles in Journal of Agricultural Studies from Macrothink Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Technical Support Office ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).