Competing Multiple Accountability Mechanisms and Public Administrators’ Responses in the Health Sector in Kenya
Kenneth Karumba
Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 2020, vol. 10, issue 2, 213232
Abstract:
Accountability in public sector is a complex concept. Public administrators are held accountable by multiple mechanisms of accountability. It is unclear in the public health sector in Kenya which of the four mechanisms of hierarchical, professional, legal and political accountability dominates accountability responses of hospital administrators. The objective of this study was to assess which among the competing multiple accountability mechanism is accorded priority in the health sector in Kenya. The study adopted a case study design targeting hospital administrators from 36 public hospitals in 14 Counties in Kenya. The study found out that professional accountability tend to be given precedence over other forms of public accountability in ordinary conditions and hierarchical accountability under crisis situations. The study concluded that hospital administrators are confronted with all the four mechanisms, but their intensity on accountability vary.
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jpag/article/download/17140/13293 (application/pdf)
http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jpag/article/view/17140 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mth:jpag88:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:213-232
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Public Administration and Governance is currently edited by Milo Thomson
More articles in Journal of Public Administration and Governance from Macrothink Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Technical Support Office ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).