A Pedagogical Note on Modeling the Economic Benefit of Emissions Abatement vs. the Economic Harm from Emissions

Christopher S. Decker

Journal for Economic Educators, 2012, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-6

Abstract: The number of undergraduate-level textbooks on environmental economics has increased in recent years, but the textbook treatment of optimal emissions (abatement) varies markedly from textbook to textbook. In particular, there is no consensus as to whether to model the economic “bad” (i.e. emissions) or the economic “good” (abatement). This inconsistency can lead to some needless confusion for students introduced to environmental economics for the first time, particularly those students outside of the formal economics major, such as students of business administration and public policy. As a means of mitigating this confusion, I propose a simple example that instructors can use in lecture, test question, or student assignment format, that illustrates the duality between modeling emissions and abatement.

Keywords: environmental policy; optimal abatement; optimal emissions; duality; social welfare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A22 A23 Q50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://frank.mtsu.edu/~jee/2012/1_MS611_pp1to6.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mts:jrnlee:v:12:y:2012:i:1:p:1-6

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal for Economic Educators from Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael Roach ().