EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Industrial Policy in the United States. The theoretical debate, the rhetoric, and the practices in the era of the Washington Consensus

Mattia Tassinari

L'industria, 2014, issue 1, 69-100

Abstract: The purpose of this work is to understand, by studying the American experience, which elements are crucial for the success of the industrial policy strategies implemented in response to contemporary issues. At this scope it is essential to re-explore in particular the American experience of the Eighties and Nineties, in the era of the Washington Consensus. In fact, in the «traditional» rhetoric of the American government, rooted in the us in those years, industrial policy has been always rejected. Thus, to understand the role that can be played by the government in contemporary economies, it is necessary to analyze the reality of the public intervention in a context that has clearly highlighted its weaknesses. In this framework, the work provides a rereading of how the American government, in the practices of public intervention, has played an active role in the promotion of the us industrial system.

Keywords: Industrial Policy; Washington Consensus; United States; Reaganomics; WTO. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/77264 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/77264 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/77264:y:2014:i:1:p:69-100

Access Statistics for this article

L'industria is currently edited by Patrizio Bianchi

More articles in L'industria from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/77264:y:2014:i:1:p:69-100