EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Ricerca e innovazione: un'analisi comparata

Antonio Sassu and Sergio Lodde

L'industria, 2002, issue 4, 597-628

Abstract: The aim of this paper is twofold. In the first part a comparative analysis of the main tendencies of R&D expenditure and patenting activity in a sample of OECD countries is done for the period 1981-99. In the second an econometric analysis is performed in order to estimate the effects of the R&D carried out by different institutional actors such as firms, government and university on patenting activity. The main results are the following. Firms R&D expenditure steadily increased during the period under examination, while public funding shows a decreasing trend in the Nineties. These different dynamics negatively affected the share of R&D expenditure allocated to the high-tech sectors. There is no evidence of a long run tendency of decreasing returns to R&D. A weak and discontinuous convergence process is at work in terms of R&D/PIL ratio, while no clear convergence or divergence tendency can be detected with regard to patents. The econometric analysis shows that firms and government R&D affects positively patenting activity, surprisingly that does not hold for university research.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/8107 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/8107 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/8107:y:2002:i:4:p:597-628

Access Statistics for this article

L'industria is currently edited by Patrizio Bianchi

More articles in L'industria from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-09
Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/8107:y:2002:i:4:p:597-628