La valutazione della ricerca in Economia Politica

Roberto Artoni

Economia politica, 2004, issue 3, 373-382

Abstract: In this note it is argued that an evaluation of the scientific performance of individual researchers or academic institutions that relies almost exclusively on publications in the leading journals is far from satisfactory. It ignores the serious methodological problems of mainstream economics, it discriminates against non orthodox approaches and penalizes the analyses linked to a specific institutional context. It follows that only articulated methods of evaluation that take adequately into account the various methods and approaches are compatible with the progress of the discipline.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1428/18760 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1428/18760 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/18760:y:2004:i:3:p:373-382

Access Statistics for this article

Economia politica is currently edited by Alberto Quadrio Curzio, Giorgio Lunghini, Pier Carlo Nicola

More articles in Economia politica from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().