EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The European Redemption Fund: A Comparison of Two Proposals

Carmelo Parello and Vincenzo Visco

Politica economica, 2012, issue 3, 273-306

Abstract: This paper proposes a redemption fund for the euro zone countries alternative to that recently proposed by Doluca et al. (2012a) - The European Redemption Pact: an Illustrative Guide, GCEE Working Paper No. 2, February - and in coherence with a previous proposal of one of the author. In doing so, we envisage a country-specific amortization scheme in which the sovereign debts exceeding the 60%-ceiling of GDP is redeemed in 30 years. The paper shows that our redemption scheme is cheaper and less constraining than that proposed by Doluca et al. (2012a). Also, the paper shows that fiscal «brakes» - such as those required by the Fiscal Compact - are not necessary for the complete redemption of the Fund.

Keywords: Sovereign debt crisis; Public debt; Amortization schedule; European redemption fund. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1429/74176 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1429/74176 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
Working Paper: The European Redemption Fund: A Comparison of Two Proposals (2012) Downloads
Working Paper: The european redemption fund: a comparison of two proposals (2012) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/74176:y:2012:i:3:p:273-306

Access Statistics for this article

Politica economica is currently edited by Giuseppe Marotta

More articles in Politica economica from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/74176:y:2012:i:3:p:273-306