I giudici e l'analisi economica del diritto due anni dopo

Roberto Pardolesi and Bruno Tassone

Mercato Concorrenza Regole, 2005, issue 3, 579-600

Abstract: Two years after the publication of the book aiming to verify whether, and to which extent, Italian judges are sensitive to the suggestions of the economic analysis of law (EAL), the two authors update their account and try to strike a first, interlocutory balance. The comment of four new, and so far unpublished judicial opinions concerning the areas of contracts, torts and property rights offers the opportunity to draw some further insights about the effects - positive, not only from the judicial standpoint - stemming from the confrontation between judges and the economic analysis of (private) law.

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/21146 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/21146 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/21146:y:2005:i:3:p:579-600

Access Statistics for this article

Mercato Concorrenza Regole is currently edited by Giuliano Amato

More articles in Mercato Concorrenza Regole from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().