A response to our reviewers

Lucio Baccaro, Mark Blyth and Jonas Pontusson

Stato e mercato, 2023, issue 3, 497-504

Abstract: This essay responds to the critiques raised by Anke Hassel and Roberto Pedersini by focusing on four themes: the innovativeness (or not) of the growth models (GM) perspective, the need to integrate demand-side and supply-side considerations in the analysis of comparative capitalism, the relationship of the GM perspective to Post-Keynesian economics, and the role of agency and politics

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1425/112853 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1425/112853 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/112853:y:2023:i:3:p:497-504

Access Statistics for this article

Stato e mercato is currently edited by Michele Salvati

More articles in Stato e mercato from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().