The Downside of Partecipatory-Deliberative Governance

Lucio Baccaro and Konstantinos Papadakis

Stato e mercato, 2008, issue 3, 475-504

Abstract: This paper provides an empirically-grounded critique of what we refer to as "participatory-deliberative governance" (PDG) theory, and, drawing on Habermas' social theory, articulates an alternative to it. The critique of PDG is based on an in-depth study of three participatory fora in South Africa: the National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC), the Child Labour Intersectoral Group (CLIG), and the South African National AIDS Council (SANAC). The paper argues that coordination through deliberation is unlikely to occur in formal settings (where discourses are mostly about the accommodation of existing interests) and is more likely to be found in the informal public sphere, where the preferences of citizens are still malleable, and it is possible for civil society groups to build communicative power by articulating moral arguments that motivate and mobilize the public. This form of power can then be expended by civil society groups to counterbalance other forms of (non-communicative) power impinging on the formal decision-making sphere.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1425/28364 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1425/28364 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/28364:y:2008:i:3:p:475-504

Access Statistics for this article

Stato e mercato is currently edited by Michele Salvati

More articles in Stato e mercato from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().