At the periphery of the crisis. Populism and the weakness of representative democracy

Ilvo Diamanti

Stato e mercato, 2018, issue 1, 117-126

Abstract: The paper investigates the concept of populism, and the political phenomena this terms tries (imprecisely) to identify. First, populism implies 1) the existence of one people, 2) that this people defines itself through borders, 3) that these boarders separate the people from the «others». Second, at the base of the populist discourse is a radical criticism to representative democracy, which takes the form of appeals to direct democracy, and to the identification of the people with the leader and of the leader with the people, without any form of mediation. Third, the social bases of populism are different among different populisms, but have in common the perception of being «periphery» and express the growing discomfort of the peripheries. Lastly, populism is a form of communication which can penetrate all political orientations. If they want to keep support, all parties and leaders have to access a certain degree of populism, which is imposed by the very same political arena in which they operate.

Keywords: Crisis Management; Populism; Voting Behavior. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1425/89852 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1425/89852 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/89852:y:2018:i:1:p:117-126

Access Statistics for this article

Stato e mercato is currently edited by Michele Salvati

More articles in Stato e mercato from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().