Capital Adequacy Rules and Supervisory Actions: Impacts on Banks’ Strategic Choices

Elisabetta Gualandri and Valeria Venturelli

Banca Impresa Società, 2019, issue 2, 211-228

Abstract: The bank regulatory apparatus has become more and more complex and has affected banks strategic choices, business models and banks’ roles in financing economy. Capital adequacy requirements of Basel 3, Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 (SREP), have determined a combined and simultaneous action on recapitalization and de-risking, with RWA reduction, highlighting the nexus: «capital adequacy requirements-business model- profitability and capital remuneration». In a situation of over-regulation and possible overlapping of competences between regulators and supervisors, strategic actions to regain sustainable profitability are to be identified in business model changes and in streamlining structures.

Keywords: Regulation; Supervision; Banks; De-risking; Strategies; Business Model. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1435/94740 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1435/94740 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:jqmthn:doi:10.1435/94740:y:2019:i:2:p:211-228

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Banca Impresa Società from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().