Performance of Six Sigma Rebalancing for Portfolios Mixing Polar Investment Styles
Martin Boďa and
Mária Kanderová
Additional contact information
Mária Kanderová: Quantitative Methods and Information Systems Department, Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Národná 1, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2020, vol. 68, issue 1, 139-155
Abstract:
The paper investigates usefulness of a rebalancing strategy that was proposed in 2014 by Boďa and Roháčová and is based on ideas borrowed from the managerial concept Six Sigma. Centring upon a small investor who is willing to invest into S&P 500 Index components in an attempt to track the S&P 500 Index, the paper compares the performance of different rebalancing strategies for four different sets of monthly data ranging from 2011 to 2017. Rebalancing is undertaken on a monthly basis and tracking portfolios are diversified by investing in proportions into stocks belonging to investment styles defined by size (big/small caps) and market-to-book ratio (growth/value stocks). The results show that the Six Sigma rebalancing strategy is superior in a transaction-cost-free environment, but when transaction costs are accounted for, it is dominated by the buy-and hold strategy and a liberal threshold rebalancing strategy. Overall, periodic rebalancing fares unsatisfactorily with respect to criteria adopted for performance assessment.
Keywords: rebalancing; Six Sigma; big and small caps; growth and value stocks; quadratic tracking; performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun202068010139.html (text/html)
http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun202068010139.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2020068010139
DOI: 10.11118/actaun202068010139
Access Statistics for this article
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis is currently edited by Markéta Havlásková
More articles in Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis from Mendel University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().