Effects of policy-driven hypothetical air pollutant interventions on childhood asthma incidence in southern California

Erika Garcia (), Robert Urman, Kiros Berhane, Rob McConnell and Frank Gilliland
Additional contact information
Erika Garcia: Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
Robert Urman: Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
Kiros Berhane: Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
Rob McConnell: Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
Frank Gilliland: Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, vol. 116, issue 32, 15883-15888

Abstract: Childhood asthma is a major public health concern and has significant adverse impacts on the lives of the children and their families, and on society. There is an emerging link between air pollution, which is ubiquitous in our environment, particularly in urban centers, and incident childhood asthma. Here, using data from 3 successive cohorts recruited from the same 9 communities in southern California over a span of 20 y (1993 to 2014), we estimated asthma incidence using G-computation under hypothetical air pollution exposure scenarios targeting nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) and particulate matter <2.5 μm (PM 2.5 ) in separate interventions. We reported comparisons of asthma incidence under each hypothetical air pollution intervention with incidence under the observed natural course of exposure; results that may be more tangible for policymakers compared with risk ratios. Model results indicated that childhood asthma incidence rates would have been statistically significantly higher had the observed reduction in ambient NO 2 in southern California not occurred in the 1990s and early 2000s, and asthma incidence rates would have been significantly lower had NO 2 been lower than what it was observed to be. For example, compliance with a hypothetical standard of 20 ppb NO 2 was estimated to result in 20% lower childhood asthma incidence (95% CI, −27% to −11%) compared with the exposure that actually occurred. The findings for hypothetical PM 2.5 interventions, although statistically significant, were smaller in magnitude compared with results for the hypothetical NO 2 interventions. Our results suggest a large potential public health benefit of air pollutant reduction in reduced incidence of childhood asthma.

Keywords: air pollution; nitrogen dioxide; particulate matter; asthma; child (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pnas.org/content/116/32/15883.full (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nas:journl:v:116:y:2019:p:15883-15888

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by PNAS Product Team ().