Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19
Giovanni Bonaccorsi (),
Francesco Pierri,
Matteo Cinelli,
Andrea Flori,
Alessandro Galeazzi,
Francesco Porcelli,
Ana Lucia Schmidt,
Carlo Michele Valensise,
Antonio Scala,
Walter Quattrociocchi and
Fabio Pammolli ()
Additional contact information
Giovanni Bonaccorsi: Impact, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy
Matteo Cinelli: Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 00185 Rome, Italy
Andrea Flori: Impact, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy
Alessandro Galeazzi: Department of Information Engineering, Università di Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
Ana Lucia Schmidt: Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Università Ca’Foscari di Venezia, 30123 Venizia, Italy
Carlo Michele Valensise: Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
Antonio Scala: Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 00185 Rome, Italy
Walter Quattrociocchi: Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Università Ca’Foscari di Venezia, 30123 Venizia, Italy
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, vol. 117, issue 27, 15530-15535
Abstract:
In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several national governments have applied lockdown restrictions to reduce the infection rate. Here we perform a massive analysis on near–real-time Italian mobility data provided by Facebook to investigate how lockdown strategies affect economic conditions of individuals and local governments. We model the change in mobility as an exogenous shock similar to a natural disaster. We identify two ways through which mobility restrictions affect Italian citizens. First, we find that the impact of lockdown is stronger in municipalities with higher fiscal capacity. Second, we find evidence of a segregation effect, since mobility contraction is stronger in municipalities in which inequality is higher and for those where individuals have lower income per capita. Our results highlight both the social costs of lockdown and a challenge of unprecedented intensity: On the one hand, the crisis is inducing a sharp reduction of fiscal revenues for both national and local governments; on the other hand, a significant fiscal effort is needed to sustain the most fragile individuals and to mitigate the increase in poverty and inequality induced by the lockdown.
Keywords: COVID-19; economic segregation; human mobility; national lockdown (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (111)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pnas.org/content/117/27/15530.full (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:15530-15535
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by PNAS Product Team ().