Toward a science of delivering aid with dignity: Experimental evidence and local forecasts from Kenya

Catherine C. Thomas (), Nicholas G. Otis, Justin R. Abraham, Hazel Rose Markus () and Gregory M. Walton
Additional contact information
Catherine C. Thomas: Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Nicholas G. Otis: Division of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Justin R. Abraham: Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, CA 92161
Hazel Rose Markus: Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Gregory M. Walton: Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, vol. 117, issue 27, 15546-15553

Abstract: How can governments and nonprofits design aid programs that afford dignity and facilitate beneficial outcomes for recipients? We conceptualize dignity as a state that manifests when the stigma associated with receiving aid is countered and recipients are empowered, both in culturally resonant ways. Yet materials from the largest cash transfer programs in Africa predominantly characterize recipients as needy and vulnerable. Three studies examined the causal effects of alternative aid narratives on cash transfer recipients and donors. In study 1, residents of low-income settlements in Nairobi, Kenya ( N = 565) received cash-based aid accompanied by a randomly assigned narrative: the default deficit-focused “Poverty Alleviation” narrative, an “Individual Empowerment” narrative, or a “Community Empowerment” narrative. They then chose whether to spend time building business skills or watching leisure videos. Both empowerment narratives improved self-efficacy and anticipated social mobility, but only the “Community Empowerment” narrative significantly motivated recipients’ choice to build skills and reduced stigma. Given the diverse settings in which aid is delivered, how can organizations quickly identify effective narratives in a context? We asked recipients to predict which narrative would best motivate skill-building in their community. In study 2, this “local forecasting” methodology outperformed participant evaluations and experimental pilots in accurately ranking treatments. Finally, study 3 confirmed that the narrative most effective for recipients did not undermine donors’ willingness to contribute to the program. Together these studies show that responding to recipients’ psychological and sociocultural realities in the design of aid can afford recipients dignity and help realize aid’s potential.

Keywords: poverty; narrative; agency; culture; forecasting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pnas.org/content/117/27/15546.full (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:15546-15553

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by PNAS Product Team ().