Highly public anti-Black violence is associated with poor mental health days for Black Americans

David S. Curtis (), Tessa Washburn, Hedwig Lee, Ken R. Smith, Jaewhan Kim, Connor D. Martz, Michael R. Kramer and David H. Chae
Additional contact information
David S. Curtis: Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Tessa Washburn: Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Hedwig Lee: Department of Sociology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
Ken R. Smith: Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Jaewhan Kim: Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Connor D. Martz: Department of Human Development and Family Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
Michael R. Kramer: Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
David H. Chae: Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, vol. 118, issue 17, e2019624118

Abstract: Highly public anti-Black violence in the United States may cause widely experienced distress for Black Americans. This study identifies 49 publicized incidents of racial violence and quantifies national interest based on Google searches; incidents include police killings of Black individuals, decisions not to indict or convict the officer involved, and hate crime murders. Weekly time series of population mental health are produced for 2012 through 2017 using two sources: 1) Google Trends as national search volume for psychological distress terms and 2) the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) as average poor mental health days in the past 30 d among Black respondents (mean weekly sample size of 696). Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models accounted for autocorrelation, monthly unemployment, season and year effects, 52-wk lags, news-related searches for suicide (for Google Trends), and depression prevalence and percent female (for BRFSS). National search interest varied more than 100-fold between racial violence incidents. Black BRFSS respondents reported 0.26 more poor mental health days during weeks with two or more racial incidents relative to none, and 0.13 more days with each log 10 increase in national interest. Estimates were robust to sensitivity tests, including controlling for monthly number of Black homicide victims and weekly search interest in riots. As expected, racial incidents did not predict average poor mental health days among White BRFSS respondents. Results with national psychological distress from Google Trends were mixed but generally unsupportive of hypotheses. Reducing anti-Black violence may benefit Black Americans’ mental health nationally.

Keywords: racism; mental health; population health; disparities; big data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pnas.org/content/118/17/e2019624118.full (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2019624118

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by PNAS Product Team ().