Market forces determine the distribution of a leaky function in a simple microbial community
Sarah J. Adkins-Jablonsky,
Colleen M. Clark,
Spiridon E. Papoulis,
Matthew D. Kuhl and
J. Jeffrey Morris ()
Additional contact information
Sarah J. Adkins-Jablonsky: Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294
Colleen M. Clark: BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824; Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Spiridon E. Papoulis: BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824; Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
Matthew D. Kuhl: Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294
J. Jeffrey Morris: Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, vol. 118, issue 39, e2109813118
Abstract:
Many biological functions are leaky, and organisms that perform them contribute some of their products to a community “marketplace” in which nonperforming individuals may compete for them. Leaky functions are partitioned unequally in microbial communities, and the evolutionary forces determining which species perform them and which become beneficiaries are poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the market principle of comparative advantage determines the distribution of a leaky antibiotic resistance gene in an environment occupied by two “species”—strains of Escherichia coli growing on mutually exclusive resources and thus occupying separate niches. Communities comprised of antibiotic-resistant cells were rapidly invaded by sensitive cells of both types. While the two phenotypes coexisted stably for 500 generations, in 15/18 replicates, antibiotic sensitivity became fixed in one species. Fixation always occurred in the same species despite both species being genetically identical except for their niche-defining mutation. In the absence of antibiotic, the fitness cost of resistance was identical in both species. However, the intrinsic resistance of the species that ultimately became the sole helper was significantly lower, and thus its reward for expressing the resistance gene was higher. Opportunity cost of resistance, not absolute cost or efficiency of antibiotic removal, determined which species became the helper, consistent with the economic theory of comparative advantage. We present a model that suggests that this market-like dynamic is a general property of Black Queen systems and, in communities dependent on multiple leaky functions, could lead to the spontaneous development of an equitable and efficient division of labor.
Keywords: Black Queen hypothesis; comparative advantage; ecological species concept (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pnas.org/content/118/39/e2109813118.full (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2109813118
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by PNAS Product Team ().