Personal hardship narrows the partisan gap in COVID-19 and climate change responses

Sara M. Constantino, Alicia D. Cooperman, Robert O. Keohane and Elke U. Weber
Additional contact information
Sara M. Constantino: a School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540;; b Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115;; c School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115;
Alicia D. Cooperman: d Department of Political Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052;; e Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052;
Robert O. Keohane: a School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540;
Elke U. Weber: a School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540;; f Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540;; g Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2022, vol. 119, issue 46, e2120653119

Abstract: In highly polarized political environments like the United States, people interpret health and environmental issues through a partisan lens. Democrats have been more concerned about COVID-19 and more willing to socially distance than Republicans—resulting in a substantial partisan gap in concern, action, and policy support. However, using cross-sectional comparisons from a three-wave survey during March to November 2020, we find that self-reported hardship due to COVID-19 is associated with a narrowing of the partisan gap and does not depend on party affiliation. We find similar results in the context of climate change. These findings suggest that personal experience may counter partisan messaging and worldviews, at least in response to an immediate threat.

Keywords: COVID-19; climate change; personal experience; partisanship; risk as feelings (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pnas.org/content/119/46/e2120653119.full (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2120653119

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by PNAS Product Team ().