Three institutional pathways to envision the future of the IPCC

Shinichiro Asayama (), Kari Pryck (), Silke Beck, Béatrice Cointe, Paul N. Edwards, Hélène Guillemot, Karin M. Gustafsson, Friederike Hartz, Hannah Hughes, Bård Lahn, Olivier Leclerc, Rolf Lidskog, Jasmine E. Livingston, Irene Lorenzoni, Joanna Petrasek MacDonald, Martin Mahony, Jean Carlos Hochsprung Miguel, Marko Monteiro, Jessica O’Reilly, Warren Pearce, Arthur Petersen, Bernd Siebenhüner, Tora Skodvin, Adam Standring, Göran Sundqvist, Renzo Taddei, Bianca Bavel, Mark Vardy, Yulia Yamineva and Mike Hulme ()
Additional contact information
Shinichiro Asayama: National Institute for Environmental Studies
Kari Pryck: University of Geneva
Silke Beck: Technical University of Munich
Béatrice Cointe: Mines Paris, PSL University, i3 CNRS (UMR 9217)
Paul N. Edwards: Stanford University
Hélène Guillemot: Centre Alexandre Koyré, CNRS
Karin M. Gustafsson: Örebro University
Friederike Hartz: University of Cambridge
Hannah Hughes: Aberystwyth University
Bård Lahn: University of Oslo
Olivier Leclerc: Université Paris Nanterre, Ecole Normale Supérieure – PSL
Rolf Lidskog: Örebro University
Jasmine E. Livingston: Utrecht University
Irene Lorenzoni: University of East Anglia
Joanna Petrasek MacDonald: Joanna Petrasek MacDonald Consulting
Martin Mahony: University of East Anglia
Jean Carlos Hochsprung Miguel: State University of Campinas
Marko Monteiro: State University of Campinas
Jessica O’Reilly: Indiana University Bloomington
Warren Pearce: University of Sheffield
Arthur Petersen: University College London
Bernd Siebenhüner: Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Tora Skodvin: University of Oslo
Adam Standring: Örebro University
Göran Sundqvist: University of Gothenburg
Renzo Taddei: Federal University of São Paulo
Bianca Bavel: University College Dublin
Mark Vardy: Kwantlen Polytechnic University
Yulia Yamineva: University of Eastern Finland
Mike Hulme: University of Cambridge

Nature Climate Change, 2023, vol. 13, issue 9, 877-880

Abstract: The IPCC has been successful at building its scientific authority, but it will require institutional reform for staying relevant to new and changing political contexts. Exploring a range of alternative future pathways for the IPCC can help guide crucial decisions about redefining its purpose.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01780-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcli:v:13:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1038_s41558-023-01780-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/nclimate/

DOI: 10.1038/s41558-023-01780-8

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Climate Change is currently edited by Bronwyn Wake

More articles in Nature Climate Change from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().