Atmospheric verification of anthropogenic CO2 emission trends

Roger J. Francey (), Cathy M. Trudinger (), Marcel van der Schoot, Rachel M. Law, Paul B. Krummel, Ray L. Langenfelds, L. Paul Steele, Colin E. Allison, Ann R. Stavert, Robert J. Andres and Christian Rödenbeck
Additional contact information
Roger J. Francey: Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Cathy M. Trudinger: Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Marcel van der Schoot: Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Rachel M. Law: Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Paul B. Krummel: Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Ray L. Langenfelds: Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
L. Paul Steele: Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Colin E. Allison: Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Ann R. Stavert: Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Robert J. Andres: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Christian Rödenbeck: Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry

Nature Climate Change, 2013, vol. 3, issue 5, 520-524

Abstract: Abstract International efforts to limit global warming and ocean acidification aim to slow the growth of atmospheric CO2, guided primarily by national and industry estimates of production and consumption of fossil fuels. Atmospheric verification of emissions is vital but present global inversion methods are inadequate for this purpose. We demonstrate a clear response in atmospheric CO2 coinciding with a sharp 2010 increase in Asian emissions but show persisting slowing mean CO2 growth from 2002/03. Growth and inter-hemispheric concentration difference during the onset and recovery of the Global Financial Crisis support a previous speculation that the reported 2000–2008 emissions surge is an artefact, most simply explained by a cumulative underestimation (∼ 9 Pg C) of 1994–2007 emissions; in this case, post-2000 emissions would track mid-range of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change emission scenarios. An alternative explanation requires changes in the northern terrestrial land sink that offset anthropogenic emission changes. We suggest atmospheric methods to help resolve this ambiguity.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1817 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcli:v:3:y:2013:i:5:d:10.1038_nclimate1817

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/nclimate/

DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1817

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Climate Change is currently edited by Bronwyn Wake

More articles in Nature Climate Change from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().