Reassessing emotion in climate change communication

Daniel A. Chapman (), Brian Lickel and Ezra M. Markowitz
Additional contact information
Daniel A. Chapman: University of Massachusetts — Amherst
Brian Lickel: University of Massachusetts — Amherst
Ezra M. Markowitz: University of Massachusetts — Amherst

Nature Climate Change, 2017, vol. 7, issue 12, 850-852

Abstract: Debate over effective climate change communication must be grounded in rigorous affective science. Rather than treating emotions as simple levers to be pulled to promote desired outcomes, emotions should be viewed as one integral component of a cognitive feedback system guiding responses to challenging decision-making problems.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-017-0021-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcli:v:7:y:2017:i:12:d:10.1038_s41558-017-0021-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/nclimate/

DOI: 10.1038/s41558-017-0021-9

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Climate Change is currently edited by Bronwyn Wake

More articles in Nature Climate Change from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().