Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities
Marco Springmann (),
Daniel Mason-D’Croz,
Sherman Robinson,
Keith Wiebe,
H. Charles J. Godfray,
Mike Rayner and
Peter Scarborough
Additional contact information
Marco Springmann: Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for Non-Communicable Disease Prevention, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus
Daniel Mason-D’Croz: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2033 K Street NW
Keith Wiebe: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2033 K Street NW
H. Charles J. Godfray: Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, University of Oxford
Mike Rayner: Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for Non-Communicable Disease Prevention, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus
Peter Scarborough: Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for Non-Communicable Disease Prevention, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Daniel Mason-D'Croz
Nature Climate Change, 2017, vol. 7, issue 1, 69-74
Abstract:
Abstract The projected rise in food-related greenhouse gas emissions could seriously impede efforts to limit global warming to acceptable levels. Despite that, food production and consumption have long been excluded from climate policies, in part due to concerns about the potential impact on food security. Using a coupled agriculture and health modelling framework, we show that the global climate change mitigation potential of emissions pricing of food commodities could be substantial, and that levying greenhouse gas taxes on food commodities could, if appropriately designed, be a health-promoting climate policy in high-income countries, as well as in most low- and middle-income countries. Sparing food groups known to be beneficial for health from taxation, selectively compensating for income losses associated with tax-related price increases, and using a portion of tax revenues for health promotion are potential policy options that could help avert most of the negative health impacts experienced by vulnerable groups, whilst still promoting changes towards diets which are more environmentally sustainable.
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (39)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate3155 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcli:v:7:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_nclimate3155
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/nclimate/
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3155
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Climate Change is currently edited by Bronwyn Wake
More articles in Nature Climate Change from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().