Biological relevance of computationally predicted pathogenicity of noncoding variants
Li Liu,
Maxwell D. Sanderford,
Ravi Patel,
Pramod Chandrashekar,
Greg Gibson () and
Sudhir Kumar ()
Additional contact information
Li Liu: Arizona State University
Maxwell D. Sanderford: Temple University
Ravi Patel: Temple University
Pramod Chandrashekar: Arizona State University
Greg Gibson: Georgia Institute of Technology
Sudhir Kumar: Temple University
Nature Communications, 2019, vol. 10, issue 1, 1-11
Abstract:
Abstract Computational prediction of the phenotypic propensities of noncoding single nucleotide variants typically combines annotation of genomic, functional and evolutionary attributes into a single score. Here, we evaluate if the claimed excellent accuracies of these predictions translate into high rates of success in addressing questions important in biological research, such as fine mapping causal variants, distinguishing pathogenic allele(s) at a given position, and prioritizing variants for genetic risk assessment. A significant disconnect is found to exist between the statistical modelling and biological performance of predictive approaches. We discuss fundamental reasons underlying these deficiencies and suggest that future improvements of computational predictions need to address confounding of allelic, positional and regional effects as well as imbalance of the proportion of true positive variants in candidate lists.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-08270-y Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-08270-y
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-08270-y
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().