Acute hunger does not always undermine prosociality
Jan A. Häusser (),
Christina Stahlecker (),
Andreas Mojzisch,
Johannes Leder,
Paul A. M. Lange and
Nadira S. Faber
Additional contact information
Jan A. Häusser: Justus-Liebig-University Gießen
Christina Stahlecker: Justus-Liebig-University Gießen
Andreas Mojzisch: University of Hildesheim
Johannes Leder: University of Bamberg
Paul A. M. Lange: VU Amsterdam
Nadira S. Faber: University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter
Nature Communications, 2019, vol. 10, issue 1, 1-10
Abstract:
Abstract It has been argued that, when they are acutely hungry, people act in self-protective ways by keeping resources to themselves rather than sharing them. In four studies, using experimental, quasi-experimental, and correlational designs (total N = 795), we examine the effects of acute hunger on prosociality in a wide variety of non-interdependent tasks (e.g. dictator game) and interdependent tasks (e.g. public goods games). While our procedures successfully increase subjective hunger and decrease blood glucose, we do not find significant effects of hunger on prosociality. This is true for both decisions incentivized with money and with food. Meta-analysis across all tasks reveals a very small effect of hunger on prosociality in non-interdependent tasks (d = 0.108), and a non-significant effect in interdependent tasks (d = −0.076). In study five (N = 197), we show that, in stark contrast to our empirical findings, people hold strong lay theories that hunger undermines prosociality.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12579-7 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-12579-7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12579-7
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().