Metamorphic pressure variation in a coherent Alpine nappe challenges lithostatic pressure paradigm
Cindy Luisier (),
Lukas Baumgartner,
Stefan M. Schmalholz,
Guillaume Siron and
Torsten Vennemann
Additional contact information
Cindy Luisier: University of Lausanne
Lukas Baumgartner: University of Lausanne
Stefan M. Schmalholz: University of Lausanne
Guillaume Siron: University of Lausanne
Torsten Vennemann: University of Lausanne
Nature Communications, 2019, vol. 10, issue 1, 1-11
Abstract:
Abstract Pressure–temperature–time paths obtained from minerals in metamorphic rocks allow the reconstruction of the geodynamic evolution of mountain ranges under the assumption that rock pressure is lithostatic. This lithostatic pressure paradigm enables converting the metamorphic pressure directly into the rock’s burial depth and, hence, quantifying the rock’s burial and exhumation history. In the coherent Monte Rosa tectonic unit, Western Alps, considerably different metamorphic pressures are determined in adjacent rocks. Here we show with field and microstructural observations, phase petrology and geochemistry that these pressure differences cannot be explained by tectonic mixing, retrogression of high-pressure minerals, or lack of equilibration of mineral assemblages. We propose that the determined pressure difference of 0.8 ± 0.3 GPa is due to deviation from lithostatic pressure. We show with two analytical solutions for compression- and reaction-induced stress in mechanically heterogeneous rock that such pressure differences are mechanically feasible, supporting our interpretation of significant outcrop-scale pressure gradients.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12727-z Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-12727-z
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12727-z
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().