New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data
Oliver E. J. Wing (),
Nicholas Pinter,
Paul D. Bates and
Carolyn Kousky
Additional contact information
Oliver E. J. Wing: University of Bristol
Nicholas Pinter: University of California
Paul D. Bates: University of Bristol
Carolyn Kousky: University of Pennsylvania
Nature Communications, 2020, vol. 11, issue 1, 1-10
Abstract:
Abstract Improvements in modelling power and input data have vastly improved the precision of physical flood models, but translation into economic outputs requires depth–damage functions that are inadequately verified. In particular, flood damage is widely assumed to increase monotonically with water depth. Here, we assess flood vulnerability in the US using >2 million claims from the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). NFIP claims data are messy, but the size of the dataset provides powerful empirical tests of damage patterns and modelling approaches. We show that current depth–damage functions consist of disparate relationships that match poorly with observations. Observed flood losses are not monotonic functions of depth, but instead better follow a beta function, with bimodal distributions for different water depths. Uncertainty in flood losses has been called the main bottleneck in flood risk studies, an obstacle that may be remedied using large-scale empirical flood damage data.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15264-2 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-15264-2
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15264-2
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().