Model-based analysis of sample index hopping reveals its widespread artifacts in multiplexed single-cell RNA-sequencing

Rick Farouni (), Haig Djambazian, Lorenzo E. Ferri, Jiannis Ragoussis and Hamed S. Najafabadi ()
Additional contact information
Rick Farouni: McGill University
Haig Djambazian: McGill University
Lorenzo E. Ferri: McGill University
Jiannis Ragoussis: McGill University
Hamed S. Najafabadi: McGill University

Nature Communications, 2020, vol. 11, issue 1, 1-8

Abstract: Abstract Index hopping is the main cause of incorrect sample assignment of sequencing reads in multiplexed pooled libraries. We introduce a statistical model for estimating the sample index-hopping rate in multiplexed droplet-based single-cell RNA-seq data and for probabilistic inference of the true sample of origin of hopped reads. We analyze several datasets and estimate the sample index hopping probability to range between 0.003–0.009, a small number that counter-intuitively gives rise to a large fraction of phantom molecules — the fraction of phantom molecules exceeds 8% in more than 25% of samples and reaches as high as 85% in low-complexity samples. Phantom molecules lead to widespread complications in downstream analyses, including transcriptome mixing across cells, emergence of phantom copies of cells from other samples, and misclassification of empty droplets as cells. We demonstrate that our approach can correct for these artifacts by accurately purging the majority of phantom molecules from the data.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-16522-z Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-16522-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16522-z

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().