EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A randomised controlled trial to reduce highest priority critically important antimicrobial prescription in companion animals

David A. Singleton (), Angela Rayner, Bethaney Brant, Steven Smyth, Peter-John M. Noble, Alan D. Radford and Gina L. Pinchbeck
Additional contact information
David A. Singleton: University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road
Angela Rayner: CVS (UK) Limited, 1 Owen Road
Bethaney Brant: University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road
Steven Smyth: University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road
Peter-John M. Noble: University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road
Alan D. Radford: University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road
Gina L. Pinchbeck: University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road

Nature Communications, 2021, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: Abstract Robust evidence supporting strategies for companion animal antimicrobial stewardship is limited, despite frequent prescription of highest priority critically important antimicrobials (HPCIA). Here we describe a randomised controlled trial where electronic prescription data were utilised (August 2018–January 2019) to identify above average HPCIA-prescribing practices (n = 60), which were randomly assigned into a control group (CG) and two intervention groups. In March 2019, the light intervention group (LIG) and heavy intervention group (HIG) were notified of their above average status, and were provided with educational material (LIG, HIG), in-depth benchmarking (HIG), and follow-up meetings (HIG). Following notification, follow-up monitoring lasted for eight months (April–November 2019; post-intervention period) for all intervention groups, though HIG practices were able to access further support (i.e., follow-up meetings) for the first six of these months if requested. Post-intervention, in the HIG a 23.5% and 39.0% reduction in canine (0.5% of total consultations, 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.6, P = 0.04) and feline (4.4%, 3.4-5.3, P

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-21864-3 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-21864-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21864-3

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-21864-3