In-silico trial of intracranial flow diverters replicates and expands insights from conventional clinical trials
Ali Sarrami-Foroushani,
Toni Lassila,
Michael MacRaild,
Joshua Asquith,
Kit C. B. Roes,
James V. Byrne and
Alejandro F. Frangi ()
Additional contact information
Ali Sarrami-Foroushani: University of Leeds
Toni Lassila: University of Leeds
Michael MacRaild: University of Leeds
Joshua Asquith: University of Leeds
Kit C. B. Roes: Radboud University Medical Centre
James V. Byrne: Oxford University
Alejandro F. Frangi: University of Leeds
Nature Communications, 2021, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-12
Abstract:
Abstract The cost of clinical trials is ever-increasing. In-silico trials rely on virtual populations and interventions simulated using patient-specific models and may offer a solution to lower these costs. We present the flow diverter performance assessment (FD-PASS) in-silico trial, which models the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in 164 virtual patients with 82 distinct anatomies with a flow-diverting stent, using computational fluid dynamics to quantify post-treatment flow reduction. The predicted FD-PASS flow-diversion success rates replicate the values previously reported in three clinical trials. The in-silico approach allows broader investigation of factors associated with insufficient flow reduction than feasible in a conventional trial. Our findings demonstrate that in-silico trials of endovascular medical devices can: (i) replicate findings of conventional clinical trials, and (ii) perform virtual experiments and sub-group analyses that are difficult or impossible in conventional trials to discover new insights on treatment failure, e.g. in the presence of side-branches or hypertension.
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23998-w Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23998-w
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23998-w
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().