A natural riboswitch scaffold with self-methylation activity
Laurin Flemmich,
Sarah Heel,
Sarah Moreno,
Kathrin Breuker and
Ronald Micura ()
Additional contact information
Laurin Flemmich: University of Innsbruck, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI)
Sarah Heel: University of Innsbruck, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI)
Sarah Moreno: University of Innsbruck, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI)
Kathrin Breuker: University of Innsbruck, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI)
Ronald Micura: University of Innsbruck, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI)
Nature Communications, 2021, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-10
Abstract:
Abstract Methylation is a prevalent post-transcriptional modification encountered in coding and non-coding RNA. For RNA methylation, cells use methyltransferases and small organic substances as methyl-group donors, such as S-adenosylmethionine (SAM). SAM and other nucleotide-derived cofactors are viewed as evolutionary leftovers from an RNA world, in which riboswitches have regulated, and ribozymes have catalyzed essential metabolic reactions. Here, we disclose the thus far unrecognized direct link between a present-day riboswitch and its inherent reactivity for site-specific methylation. The key is O6-methyl pre-queuosine (m6preQ1), a potentially prebiotic nucleobase which is recognized by the native aptamer of a preQ1 class I riboswitch. Upon binding, the transfer of the ligand’s methyl group to a specific cytidine occurs, installing 3-methylcytidine (m3C) in the RNA pocket under release of pre-queuosine (preQ1). Our finding suggests that nucleic acid-mediated methylation is an ancient mechanism that has offered an early path for RNA epigenetics prior to the evolution of protein methyltransferases. Furthermore, our findings may pave the way for the development of riboswitch-descending methylation tools based on rational design as a powerful alternative to in vitro selection approaches.
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24193-7 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-24193-7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24193-7
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().