EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Storm surge and ponding explain mangrove dieback in southwest Florida following Hurricane Irma

David Lagomasino (), Temilola Fatoyinbo, Edward Castañeda-Moya, Bruce D. Cook, Paul M. Montesano, Christopher S. R. Neigh, Lawrence A. Corp, Lesley E. Ott, Selena Chavez and Douglas C. Morton
Additional contact information
David Lagomasino: East Carolina University
Temilola Fatoyinbo: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Edward Castañeda-Moya: Florida International University
Bruce D. Cook: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Paul M. Montesano: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Christopher S. R. Neigh: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Lawrence A. Corp: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Lesley E. Ott: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Selena Chavez: Florida International University
Douglas C. Morton: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Nature Communications, 2021, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-8

Abstract: Abstract Mangroves buffer inland ecosystems from hurricane winds and storm surge. However, their ability to withstand harsh cyclone conditions depends on plant resilience traits and geomorphology. Using airborne lidar and satellite imagery collected before and after Hurricane Irma, we estimated that 62% of mangroves in southwest Florida suffered canopy damage, with largest impacts in tall forests (>10 m). Mangroves on well-drained sites (83%) resprouted new leaves within one year after the storm. By contrast, in poorly-drained inland sites, we detected one of the largest mangrove diebacks on record (10,760 ha), triggered by Irma. We found evidence that the combination of low elevation (median = 9.4 cm asl), storm surge water levels (>1.4 m above the ground surface), and hydrologic isolation drove coastal forest vulnerability and were independent of tree height or wind exposure. Our results indicated that storm surge and ponding caused dieback, not wind. Tidal restoration and hydrologic management in these vulnerable, low-lying coastal areas can reduce mangrove mortality and improve resilience to future cyclones.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24253-y Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-24253-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24253-y

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-24253-y