EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Neural encoding of perceived patch value during competitive and hazardous virtual foraging

Brian Silston, Toby Wise, Song Qi, Xin Sui, Peter Dayan and Dean Mobbs ()
Additional contact information
Brian Silston: Columbia University, Department of Psychology
Toby Wise: Department of Humanities and Social Sciences and California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd
Song Qi: Department of Humanities and Social Sciences and California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd
Xin Sui: Department of Humanities and Social Sciences and California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd
Peter Dayan: Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Dean Mobbs: Department of Humanities and Social Sciences and California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd

Nature Communications, 2021, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-11

Abstract: Abstract Natural observations suggest that in safe environments, organisms avoid competition to maximize gain, while in hazardous environments the most effective survival strategy is to congregate with competition to reduce the likelihood of predatory attack. We probed the extent to which survival decisions in humans follow these patterns, and examined the factors that determined individual-level decision-making. In a virtual foraging task containing changing levels of competition in safe and hazardous patches with virtual predators, we demonstrate that human participants inversely select competition avoidant and risk diluting strategies depending on perceived patch value (PPV), a computation dependent on reward, threat, and competition. We formulate a mathematically grounded quantification of PPV in social foraging environments and show using multivariate fMRI analyses that PPV is encoded by mid-cingulate cortex (MCC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortices (vMPFC), regions that integrate action and value signals. Together, these results suggest humans utilize and integrate multidimensional information to adaptively select patches highest in PPV, and that MCC and vMPFC play a role in adapting to both competitive and predatory threats in a virtual foraging setting.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25816-9 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-25816-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25816-9

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-25816-9