EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Coincidence of cholinergic pauses, dopaminergic activation and depolarisation of spiny projection neurons drives synaptic plasticity in the striatum

John N. J. Reynolds (), Riccardo Avvisati, Paul D. Dodson, Simon D. Fisher, Manfred J. Oswald, Jeffery R. Wickens and Yan-Feng Zhang ()
Additional contact information
John N. J. Reynolds: University of Otago, School of Biomedical Sciences, Brain Health Research Centre
Riccardo Avvisati: University of Bristol
Paul D. Dodson: University of Bristol
Simon D. Fisher: University of Otago, School of Biomedical Sciences, Brain Health Research Centre
Manfred J. Oswald: University of Otago, School of Biomedical Sciences, Brain Health Research Centre
Jeffery R. Wickens: University of Otago, School of Biomedical Sciences, Brain Health Research Centre
Yan-Feng Zhang: University of Otago, School of Biomedical Sciences, Brain Health Research Centre

Nature Communications, 2022, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-9

Abstract: Abstract Dopamine-dependent long-term plasticity is believed to be a cellular mechanism underlying reinforcement learning. In response to reward and reward-predicting cues, phasic dopamine activity potentiates the efficacy of corticostriatal synapses on spiny projection neurons (SPNs). Since phasic dopamine activity also encodes other behavioural variables, it is unclear how postsynaptic neurons identify which dopamine event is to induce long-term plasticity. Additionally, it is unknown how phasic dopamine released from arborised axons can potentiate targeted striatal synapses through volume transmission. To examine these questions we manipulated striatal cholinergic interneurons (ChIs) and dopamine neurons independently in two distinct in vivo paradigms. We report that long-term potentiation (LTP) at corticostriatal synapses with SPNs is dependent on the coincidence of pauses in ChIs and phasic dopamine activation, critically accompanied by SPN depolarisation. Thus, the ChI pause defines the time window for phasic dopamine to induce plasticity, while depolarisation of SPNs constrains the synapses eligible for plasticity.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28950-0 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-28950-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28950-0

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-28950-0