Climate risk assessment needs urgent improvement

Alberto Arribas (), Ross Fairgrieve, Trevor Dhu, Juliet Bell, Rosalind Cornforth, Geoff Gooley, Chris J. Hilson, Amy Luers, Theodore G. Shepherd, Roger Street and Nick Wood
Additional contact information
Alberto Arribas: Microsoft
Ross Fairgrieve: University of Reading
Trevor Dhu: Microsoft
Juliet Bell: CSIRO
Rosalind Cornforth: University of Reading
Geoff Gooley: CSIRO
Chris J. Hilson: University of Reading
Amy Luers: Microsoft
Theodore G. Shepherd: University of Reading
Roger Street: University of Oxford
Nick Wood: Climate Policy Research

Nature Communications, 2022, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-4

Abstract: Existing constraints in current climate risk assessments make them inappropriate to effectively assess the true exposure of society and businesses to climate-related risk. Using the key constraints to guide a conceptual framework, we identify four cross-cutting and inter-related critical paths for improvement.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31979-w Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-31979-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31979-w

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().