A comparison of the genes and genesets identified by GWAS and EWAS of fifteen complex traits

Thomas Battram (), Tom R. Gaunt, Caroline L. Relton, Nicholas J. Timpson and Gibran Hemani
Additional contact information
Thomas Battram: University of Bristol
Tom R. Gaunt: University of Bristol
Caroline L. Relton: University of Bristol
Nicholas J. Timpson: University of Bristol
Gibran Hemani: University of Bristol

Nature Communications, 2022, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-13

Abstract: Abstract Identifying genomic regions pertinent to complex traits is a common goal of genome-wide and epigenome-wide association studies (GWAS and EWAS). GWAS identify causal genetic variants, directly or via linkage disequilibrium, and EWAS identify variation in DNA methylation associated with a trait. While GWAS in principle will only detect variants due to causal genes, EWAS can also identify genes via confounding, or reverse causation. We systematically compare GWAS (N > 50,000) and EWAS (N > 4500) results of 15 complex traits. We evaluate if the genes or gene ontology terms flagged by GWAS and EWAS overlap, and find substantial overlap for diastolic blood pressure, (gene overlap P = 5.2 × 10−6; term overlap P = 0.001). We superimpose our empirical findings against simulated models of varying genetic and epigenetic architectures and observe that in most cases GWAS and EWAS are likely capturing distinct genesets. Our results indicate that GWAS and EWAS are capturing different aspects of the biology of complex traits.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35037-3 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-35037-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35037-3

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().