EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Host-diet-gut microbiome interactions influence human energy balance: a randomized clinical trial

Karen D. Corbin, Elvis A. Carnero, Blake Dirks, Daria Igudesman, Fanchao Yi, Andrew Marcus, Taylor L. Davis, Richard E. Pratley, Bruce E. Rittmann, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown () and Steven R. Smith ()
Additional contact information
Karen D. Corbin: AdventHealth Translational Research Institute
Elvis A. Carnero: AdventHealth Translational Research Institute
Blake Dirks: Arizona State University
Daria Igudesman: AdventHealth Translational Research Institute
Fanchao Yi: AdventHealth Translational Research Institute
Andrew Marcus: Arizona State University
Taylor L. Davis: Arizona State University
Richard E. Pratley: AdventHealth Translational Research Institute
Bruce E. Rittmann: Arizona State University
Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown: Arizona State University
Steven R. Smith: AdventHealth Translational Research Institute

Nature Communications, 2023, vol. 14, issue 1, 1-17

Abstract: Abstract The gut microbiome is emerging as a key modulator of human energy balance. Prior studies in humans lacked the environmental and dietary controls and precision required to quantitatively evaluate the contributions of the gut microbiome. Using a Microbiome Enhancer Diet (MBD) designed to deliver more dietary substrates to the colon and therefore modulate the gut microbiome, we quantified microbial and host contributions to human energy balance in a controlled feeding study with a randomized crossover design in young, healthy, weight stable males and females (NCT02939703). In a metabolic ward where the environment was strictly controlled, we measured energy intake, energy expenditure, and energy output (fecal and urinary). The primary endpoint was the within-participant difference in host metabolizable energy between experimental conditions [Control, Western Diet (WD) vs. MBD]. The secondary endpoints were enteroendocrine hormones, hunger/satiety, and food intake. Here we show that, compared to the WD, the MBD leads to an additional 116 ± 56 kcals (P 0.05). Microbial 16S rRNA gene copy number (a surrogate of biomass) increases (P

Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-38778-x Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-38778-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38778-x

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-38778-x