Disordered clock protein interactions and charge blocks turn an hourglass into a persistent circadian oscillator

Meaghan S. Jankowski, Daniel Griffith, Divya G. Shastry, Jacqueline F. Pelham, Garrett M. Ginell, Joshua Thomas, Pankaj Karande, Alex S. Holehouse and Jennifer M. Hurley ()
Additional contact information
Meaghan S. Jankowski: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Daniel Griffith: Washington University School of Medicine
Divya G. Shastry: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Jacqueline F. Pelham: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Garrett M. Ginell: Washington University School of Medicine
Joshua Thomas: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Pankaj Karande: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Alex S. Holehouse: Washington University School of Medicine
Jennifer M. Hurley: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Nature Communications, 2024, vol. 15, issue 1, 1-18

Abstract: Abstract Organismal physiology is widely regulated by the molecular circadian clock, a feedback loop composed of protein complexes whose members are enriched in intrinsically disordered regions. These regions can mediate protein-protein interactions via SLiMs, but the contribution of these disordered regions to clock protein interactions had not been elucidated. To determine the functionality of these disordered regions, we applied a synthetic peptide microarray approach to the disordered clock protein FRQ in Neurospora crassa. We identified residues required for FRQ’s interaction with its partner protein FRH, the mutation of which demonstrated FRH is necessary for persistent clock oscillations but not repression of transcriptional activity. Additionally, the microarray demonstrated an enrichment of FRH binding to FRQ peptides with a net positive charge. We found that positively charged residues occurred in significant “blocks” within the amino acid sequence of FRQ and that ablation of one of these blocks affected both core clock timing and physiological clock output. Finally, we found positive charge clusters were a commonly shared molecular feature in repressive circadian clock proteins. Overall, our study suggests a mechanistic purpose for positive charge blocks and yielded insights into repressive arm protein roles in clock function.

Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47761-z Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-47761-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47761-z

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().