EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Sustainability synergies and trade-offs considering circularity and land availability for bioplastics production in Brazil

Guilherme Pessoa Nogueira, Gabriel Palma Petrielli, Mateus Ferreira Chagas, Isabelle Lobo de Mesquita Sampaio, Liliana Zanelli de Oliveira Martins, Tassia Lopes Junqueira, Edvaldo Rodrigo Morais and Thayse Aparecida Dourado Hernandes ()
Additional contact information
Guilherme Pessoa Nogueira: Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)
Gabriel Palma Petrielli: Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)
Mateus Ferreira Chagas: Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)
Isabelle Lobo de Mesquita Sampaio: Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)
Liliana Zanelli de Oliveira Martins: Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)
Tassia Lopes Junqueira: Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)
Edvaldo Rodrigo Morais: Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)
Thayse Aparecida Dourado Hernandes: Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)

Nature Communications, 2024, vol. 15, issue 1, 1-13

Abstract: Abstract Alongside the concerns of waste management, plastic production represents a future problem for managing greenhouse gas emissions. Advanced recycling and bio-based production are paramount to face this challenge. The sustainability of bio-based polyethylene (bioPE) depends on the feedstock, avoiding stress on natural resources. This work discusses Brazil’s potential to meet future global bioPE demand by 2050, using sugarcane as feedstock and considering environmental sustainability for production expansion. From the assessed 35.6 Mha, 3.55 Mha would be exempt from trade-offs related to land use change (dLUC), biodiversity, and water availability. The scenario with the highest circularity efficiency would require 22.2 Mha to meet the global demand, which can be accommodated in areas with positive impacts in carbon stocks, neutral impacts in water availability, and medium impacts on biodiversity. Here, we show that dropping demand is essential to avoid trade-offs and help consolidate bioPE as a sustainable alternative for future net-zero strategies.

Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-53201-9 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-53201-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53201-9

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-53201-9