Eccentricity pacing and rapid termination of the early Antarctic ice ages
Tim E. Peer (),
Diederik Liebrand,
Victoria E. Taylor,
Swaantje Brzelinski,
Iris Wolf,
André Bornemann,
Oliver Friedrich,
Steven M. Bohaty,
Chuang Xuan,
Peter C. Lippert and
Paul A. Wilson
Additional contact information
Tim E. Peer: National Oceanography Centre Southampton
Diederik Liebrand: National Oceanography Centre Southampton
Victoria E. Taylor: National Oceanography Centre Southampton
Swaantje Brzelinski: Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Iris Wolf: Goethe-University Frankfurt
André Bornemann: Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources
Oliver Friedrich: Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Steven M. Bohaty: Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Chuang Xuan: National Oceanography Centre Southampton
Peter C. Lippert: University of Utah
Paul A. Wilson: National Oceanography Centre Southampton
Nature Communications, 2024, vol. 15, issue 1, 1-10
Abstract:
Abstract Earth’s obliquity and eccentricity cycles are strongly imprinted on Earth’s climate and widely used to measure geological time. However, the record of these imprints on the oxygen isotope record in deep-sea benthic foraminifera (δ18Ob) shows contradictory signals that violate isotopic principles and cause controversy over climate-ice sheet interactions. Here, we present a δ18Ob record of high fidelity from International Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Site U1406 in the northwest Atlantic Ocean. We compare our record to other records for the time interval between 28 and 20 million years ago, when Earth was warmer than today, and only Antarctic ice sheets existed. The imprint of eccentricity on δ18Ob is remarkably consistent globally whereas the obliquity signal is inconsistent between sites, indicating that eccentricity was the primary pacemaker of land ice volume. The larger eccentricity-paced early Antarctic ice ages were vulnerable to rapid termination. These findings imply that the self-stabilizing hysteresis effects of large land-based early Antarctic ice sheets were strong enough to maintain ice growth despite consecutive insolation-induced polar warming episodes. However, rapid ice age terminations indicate that resistance to melting was weaker than simulated by numerical models and regularly overpowered, sometimes abruptly.
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54186-1 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-54186-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54186-1
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().