A data-driven latent variable approach to validating the research domain criteria framework
S. K. L. Quah (),
B. Jo,
C. Geniesse,
L. Q. Uddin,
J. A. Mumford,
D. M. Barch,
D. A. Fair,
I. H. Gotlib,
R. A. Poldrack and
M. Saggar ()
Additional contact information
S. K. L. Quah: Stanford University
B. Jo: Stanford University
C. Geniesse: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
L. Q. Uddin: University of California Los Angeles
J. A. Mumford: Stanford University
D. M. Barch: Washington University in St. Louis
D. A. Fair: University of Minnesota
I. H. Gotlib: Stanford University
R. A. Poldrack: Stanford University
M. Saggar: Stanford University
Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-11
Abstract:
Abstract Despite the widespread use of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework in psychiatry and neuroscience, recent studies suggest that the RDoC is insufficiently specific or excessively broad relative to the underlying brain circuitry it seeks to elucidate. To address these concerns, we employ a latent variable approach using bifactor analysis. We examine 84 whole-brain task-based fMRI (tfMRI) activation maps from 19 studies with 6192 participants. A curated subset of 37 maps with a balanced representation of RDoC domains constitute the training set, and the remaining held-out maps form the internal validation set. External validation is conducted using 36 peak coordinate activation maps from Neurosynth, using terms of RDoC constructs as seeds for topic meta-analysis. Here, we show that a bifactor model incorporating a task-general domain and splitting the cognitive systems domain better fits the examined corpus of tfMRI data than the current RDoC framework. We also identify the domain of arousal and regulatory systems as underrepresented. Our data-driven validation supports revising the RDoC framework to reflect underlying brain circuitry more accurately.
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-55831-z Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-55831-z
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-55831-z
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().