Dynamic allostery in the peptide/MHC complex enables TCR neoantigen selectivity
Jiaqi Ma,
Cory M. Ayres,
Chad A. Brambley,
Smita S. Chandran,
Tatiana J. Rosales,
W. W. J. Gihan Perera,
Bassant Eldaly,
William T. Murray,
Steven A. Corcelli,
Evgenii L. Kovrigin,
Christopher A. Klebanoff and
Brian M. Baker ()
Additional contact information
Jiaqi Ma: University of Notre Dame
Cory M. Ayres: University of Notre Dame
Chad A. Brambley: University of Notre Dame
Smita S. Chandran: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)
Tatiana J. Rosales: University of Notre Dame
W. W. J. Gihan Perera: University of Notre Dame
Bassant Eldaly: University of Notre Dame
William T. Murray: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)
Steven A. Corcelli: University of Notre Dame
Evgenii L. Kovrigin: University of Notre Dame
Christopher A. Klebanoff: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)
Brian M. Baker: University of Notre Dame
Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-21
Abstract:
Abstract The inherent antigen cross-reactivity of the T cell receptor (TCR) is balanced by high specificity. Surprisingly, TCR specificity often manifests in ways not easily interpreted from static structures. Here we show that TCR discrimination between an HLA-A*03:01 (HLA-A3)-restricted public neoantigen and its wild-type (WT) counterpart emerges from distinct motions within the HLA-A3 peptide binding groove that vary with the identity of the peptide’s first primary anchor. These motions create a dynamic gate that, in the presence of the WT peptide, impedes a large conformational change required for TCR binding. The neoantigen is insusceptible to this limiting dynamic, and, with the gate open, upon TCR binding the central tryptophan can transit underneath the peptide backbone to the opposing side of the HLA-A3 peptide binding groove. Our findings thus reveal a novel mechanism driving TCR specificity for a cancer neoantigen that is rooted in the dynamic and allosteric nature of peptide/MHC-I binding grooves, with implications for resolving long-standing and often confounding questions about T cell specificity.
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56004-8 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-56004-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56004-8
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().