Mass spectrometry methods and mathematical PK/PD model for decision tree-guided covalent drug development
Md Amin Hossain,
Rutali R. Brahme,
Brandon C. Miller,
Jakal Amin,
Marcela Barros,
Jaime L. Schneider,
Jared R. Auclair,
Carla Mattos,
Qingping Wang,
Nathalie Y. R. Agar,
David J. Greenblatt,
Roman Manetsch and
Jeffrey N. Agar ()
Additional contact information
Md Amin Hossain: Northeastern University;Boston
Rutali R. Brahme: Northeastern University;Boston
Brandon C. Miller: Northeastern University;Boston
Jakal Amin: Northeastern University;Boston
Marcela Barros: Northeastern University;Boston
Jaime L. Schneider: Harvard Medical School;Boston
Jared R. Auclair: Northeastern University;Boston
Carla Mattos: Northeastern University;Boston
Qingping Wang: Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics;Cambridge
Nathalie Y. R. Agar: Harvard Medical School;Boston
David J. Greenblatt: Tufts University School of Medicine; Boston
Roman Manetsch: Northeastern University;Boston
Jeffrey N. Agar: Northeastern University;Boston
Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-14
Abstract:
Abstract Covalent drug discovery efforts are growing rapidly but have major unaddressed limitations. These include high false positive rates during hit-to-lead identification; the inherent uncoupling of covalent drug concentration and effect [i.e., uncoupling of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD)]; and a lack of bioanalytical and modeling methods for determining PK and PD parameters. We present a covalent drug discovery workflow that addresses these limitations. Our bioanalytical methods are based upon a mass spectrometry (MS) assay that can measure the percentage of drug-target protein conjugation (% target engagement) in biological matrices. Further we develop an intact protein PK/PD model (iPK/PD) that outputs PK parameters (absorption and distribution) as well as PD parameters (mechanism of action, protein metabolic half-lives, dose, regimen, effect) based on time-dependent target engagement data. Notably, the iPK/PD model is applicable to any measurement (e.g., bottom-up MS and other drug binding studies) that yields % of target engaged. A Decision Tree is presented to guide researchers through the covalent drug development process. Our bioanalytical methods and the Decision Tree are applied to two approved drugs (ibrutinib and sotorasib); the most common plasma off-target, human serum albumin; three protein targets (KRAS, BTK, SOD1), and to a promising SOD1-targeting ALS drug candidates.
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56985-6 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-56985-6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56985-6
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().