EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Multivariable regression models improve accuracy and sensitive grading of antibiotic resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Sanjana G. Kulkarni, Sacha Laurent, Paolo Miotto, Timothy M. Walker, Leonid Chindelevitch, Carl-Michael Nathanson, Nazir Ismail, Timothy C. Rodwell and Maha R. Farhat ()
Additional contact information
Sanjana G. Kulkarni: Harvard Medical School
Sacha Laurent: Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND)
Paolo Miotto: IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
Timothy M. Walker: University of Oxford
Leonid Chindelevitch: Imperial College London
Carl-Michael Nathanson: World Health Organization (WHO)
Nazir Ismail: World Health Organization (WHO)
Timothy C. Rodwell: Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND)
Maha R. Farhat: Harvard Medical School

Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Abstract Rapid genotype-based drug susceptibility testing for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) relies on a comprehensive knowledgebase of the genetic determinants of resistance. Here we present a catalogue of resistance-associated mutations using a regression-based approach and benchmark it against the 2nd edition of the World Health Organisation (WHO) mutation catalogue. We train multivariate logistic regression models on over 52,000 MTBC isolates to associate binary resistance phenotypes for 15 antitubercular drugs with variants extracted from candidate resistance genes. Regression detects 450/457 (98%) resistance-associated variants identified using the existing method (a.k.a, SOLO method) and grades 221 (29%) more total variants than SOLO. The regression-based catalogue achieves higher sensitivity on average (+3.2 percentage points, pp) than SOLO with smaller average decreases in specificity (−1.0 pp) and positive predictive value (−1.6 pp). Sensitivity gains are highest for ethambutol, clofazimine, streptomycin, and ethionamide as regression graded considerably more resistance-associated variants than SOLO for these drugs. There is no difference between SOLO and regression with regards to meeting the target product profiles set by the WHO for genetic drug susceptibility testing, except for rifampicin, for which regression specificity is below the threshold of 98% at 97%. The regression pipeline also detects isoniazid resistance compensatory mutations in ahpC and variants linked to bedaquiline and aminoglycoside hypersusceptibility. These results inform the continued development of targeted next generation sequencing, whole genome sequencing, and other commercial molecular assays for diagnosing resistance in the MTBC.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-57174-1 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-57174-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57174-1

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-57174-1