Th1 polarization in Bordetella pertussis vaccine responses is maintained through a positive feedback loop
Lisa Willemsen,
Jiyeun Lee,
Pramod Shinde,
Ferran Soldevila,
Minori Aoki,
Shelby Orfield,
Mari Kojima,
Ricardo Silva Antunes,
Alessandro Sette and
Bjoern Peters ()
Additional contact information
Lisa Willemsen: La Jolla Institute for Immunology
Jiyeun Lee: La Jolla Institute for Immunology
Pramod Shinde: La Jolla Institute for Immunology
Ferran Soldevila: La Jolla Institute for Immunology
Minori Aoki: La Jolla Institute for Immunology
Shelby Orfield: La Jolla Institute for Immunology
Mari Kojima: La Jolla Institute for Immunology
Ricardo Silva Antunes: La Jolla Institute for Immunology
Alessandro Sette: La Jolla Institute for Immunology
Bjoern Peters: La Jolla Institute for Immunology
Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-11
Abstract:
Abstract Outbreaks of Bordetella pertussis (BP), the causative agent of whooping cough, continue despite broad vaccination coverage and have been increasing since vaccination switched from whole-BP (wP) to acellular BP (aP) vaccines. wP vaccination has been associated with more durable protective immunity and an induced Th1 polarized memory T cell response. Here, we profile, by a multi-omics approach, the immune response of 30 wP and 31 aP-primed individuals and identify correlates of T cell polarization before and after Tdap booster vaccination. We find that early transcriptional changes indicating an interferon response, followed by an increase in plasma IFN-γ and interferon-induced chemokine levels (peaking at day 1-3 post-booster), correlate best with the Th1 polarization of the vaccine-induced memory T cell response on day 28. Our studies indicate that wP-primed individuals maintain their Th1 polarization through this early memory interferon response. This suggests that stimulating the interferon pathway during vaccination could be an effective strategy to elicit a predominant Th1 response in aP-primed individuals that protects better against infection.
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58460-8 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58460-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58460-8
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().