EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Mean daily temperatures predict the thermal limits of malaria transmission better than hourly rate summation

Marta S. Shocket (), Joey R. Bernhardt, Kerri L. Miazgowicz, Alyzeh Orakzai, Savage Van M., Richard J. Hall, Sadie J. Ryan and Courtney C. Murdock ()
Additional contact information
Marta S. Shocket: Lancaster University
Joey R. Bernhardt: University of Guelph
Kerri L. Miazgowicz: University of Georgia
Alyzeh Orakzai: University of Georgia
Savage Van M.: University of California Los Angeles
Richard J. Hall: University of Georgia
Sadie J. Ryan: University of Florida
Courtney C. Murdock: University of Georgia

Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-17

Abstract: Abstract Temperature shapes the geographic distribution, seasonality, and magnitude of mosquito-borne disease outbreaks. Models predicting transmission often use mosquito and pathogen thermal responses measured at constant temperatures. However, mosquitoes live in fluctuating temperatures. Rate summation––non-linear averaging of trait values measured at constant temperatures—is commonly used to infer performance in fluctuating environments, but its accuracy is rarely validated. We measured three traits that impact transmission—bite rate, survival, fecundity—in a malaria mosquito (Anopheles stephensi) across three diurnal temperature ranges (0, 9, and 12 °C). We compared transmission thermal suitability models with temperature-trait relationships observed under constant temperatures, fluctuating temperatures, and those predicted by rate summation. We mapped results across An. stephenesi’s native Asian and invasive African ranges. We found: 1) daily temperature fluctuation trait values substantially differ from both constant temperature experiments and rate summation; 2) rate summation partially captured decreases in performance near thermal optima, yet incorrectly predicted increases near thermal limits; and 3) while thermal suitability across constant temperatures did not perfectly capture fluctuating environments, it was better than rate summation for estimating and mapping thermal limits. Our study provides insight into methods for predicting mosquito-borne disease risk and emphasizes the need to improve understanding of organismal performance under fluctuating conditions.

Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58612-w Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58612-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58612-w

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-10
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58612-w