Capivasertib plus fulvestrant in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: phase 3 CAPItello-291 study extended Chinese cohort
Xichun Hu (),
Qingyuan Zhang,
Tao Sun,
Huihua Xiong,
Wei Li,
Yuee Teng,
Yen-Shen Lu,
Ling-Ming Tseng,
Min Yan,
Hongsheng Li,
Danmei Pang,
Shin-Cheh -Chen,
Wenyan Chen,
Ou Jiang,
Jingfen Wang,
Xinhong Wu,
Xian Wang,
Aimin Zang,
Xiaojia Wang,
Julie M. Collins,
Ethan Fan,
Lin Jiang,
Xiaoling Zeng and
Nicholas C. Turner
Additional contact information
Xichun Hu: Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Fudan University
Qingyuan Zhang: Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
Tao Sun: Liaoning Cancer Hospital
Huihua Xiong: Huazhong University of Science & Technology
Wei Li: The First Hospital of Jilin University Cancer Center
Yuee Teng: The First Hospital of China Medical University
Yen-Shen Lu: National Taiwan University Hospital
Ling-Ming Tseng: Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Min Yan: The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Hongsheng Li: Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Danmei Pang: The First People’s Hospital of Foshan
Shin-Cheh -Chen: Linkou
Wenyan Chen: The Third Hospital of Nanchang
Ou Jiang: The Second People’s Hospital of Neijiang
Jingfen Wang: Linyi Cancer Hospital
Xinhong Wu: Tongji Medical College
Xian Wang: Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Aimin Zang: Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University
Xiaojia Wang: Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Julie M. Collins: AstraZeneca
Ethan Fan: AstraZeneca
Lin Jiang: AstraZeneca
Xiaoling Zeng: AstraZeneca
Nicholas C. Turner: Institute of Cancer Research
Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-12
Abstract:
Abstract In the global CAPItello-291 randomized phase 3 study (NCT04305496) in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and progression during/after aromatase inhibitor treatment, capivasertib–fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall population and patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors versus placebo–fulvestrant. We assessed efficacy and safety of capivasertib–fulvestrant in a prespecified exploratory analysis of a Chinese cohort (n = 24) and extended study with the same protocol (n = 110). Clinically meaningful PFS benefit for capivasertib–fulvestrant was observed in the overall population (median PFS: 6.9 [capivasertib–fulvestrant] versus 2.8 [placebo–fulvestrant] months; hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.34–0.76), patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors (n = 46; 5.7 versus 1.9 months; hazard ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.19–0.85) and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-non-altered tumors (patients with confirmed next-generation sequencing results [n = 68]; 9.2 versus 2.7 months; hazard ratio 0.38; 95% CI 0.21–0.68). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) with capivasertib–fulvestrant were diarrhea (60.6% versus 11.3% with placebo–fulvestrant) and hyperglycemia (57.7% versus 17.7%). AEs leading to capivasertib–fulvestrant discontinuation were reported in 11.3% of patients versus 3.2% for placebo–fulvestrant. The benefit-risk profile of capivasertib–fulvestrant in the Chinese cohort was favorable; further exploration in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-non-altered tumors is warranted.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-59210-6 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-59210-6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-59210-6
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().