Global divergence in plant and mycorrhizal fungal diversity hotspots
Laura G. van Galen (),
Justin D. Stewart,
Clara Qin,
Adriana Corrales,
Bethan F. Manley,
E. Toby Kiers,
Thomas W. Crowther and
Michael E. Van Nuland
Additional contact information
Laura G. van Galen: Society for the Protection of Underground Networks (SPUN)
Justin D. Stewart: Society for the Protection of Underground Networks (SPUN)
Clara Qin: Society for the Protection of Underground Networks (SPUN)
Adriana Corrales: Society for the Protection of Underground Networks (SPUN)
Bethan F. Manley: Society for the Protection of Underground Networks (SPUN)
E. Toby Kiers: Society for the Protection of Underground Networks (SPUN)
Thomas W. Crowther: ETH Zürich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology)
Michael E. Van Nuland: Society for the Protection of Underground Networks (SPUN)
Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-12
Abstract:
Abstract Environmental protection strategies often rely on aboveground biodiversity indicators for prioritising conservation efforts. However, substantial biodiversity exists belowground, and it remains unclear whether aboveground diversity hotspots are indicative of high soil biodiversity. Using geospatial layers of vascular plant, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and ectomycorrhizal fungi alpha diversity, we map plant–fungal diversity associations across different scales and evaluate evidence for potential correlation drivers. Plant–fungal diversity correlations are weak at the global scale but stronger at regional scales. Plant–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal correlations are generally negative in forest biomes and positive in grassland biomes, whereas plant–ectomycorrhizal fungal correlations are mostly positive or neutral. We find evidence that symbiosis strength, environmental covariation, and legacy effects all influence correlation patterns. Only 8.8% of arbuscular mycorrhizal and 1.5% of ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity hotspots overlap with plant hotspots, indicating that prioritising conservation based solely on aboveground diversity may fail to capture diverse belowground regions.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-60106-8 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-60106-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-60106-8
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().